Sound card definitions
Reply #2 – 2004-05-04 13:42:18
1) 16, 24 etc.. bit cards. I think that may laptop has 16bit card which would explain the poor performance. I think I need a 24bit external card. 16-bit is not necessarily "poor". CD audio is also 16-bit. There are of course several poor 16-bit sound cards in existence (but that's mostly because of their price range). One advantage you have with choosing a 24-bit card is of course the fact that 24-bit cards usually have good audio quality (i.e. the chance that you would accidently pick a bad 24-bit sound card is small).I understand this is the sample rate but what can the human ear detect? Isn’t CD hirer again? Why aren’t there any hire bit cards on the market? This is not the sample rate, but the bit-depth. The sample rate indicates the number of samples per second. For example, audio CD uses 44100 Hz (44.1 kHz), DAT uses 48000 Hz (48 kHz). About the bitdepth: As I mentioned before, CD audio uses 16 bits. With 24 bits, you will get more precision per sample, and subsequently a higher dynamic range. I personally believe 16-bit is "good enough", i.e. it's probably at the limit of human hearing capabilities. I don't think there has been any definite proof that humans can hear the difference between 16-bit audio nd 24-bit audio. However, the extra precision of 24-bit is welcome when you use additional processing of the sound (effects/DSP), because this processing can introduce rounding errors.2) What is the bit rate (96kbs) how does this affect the sound quality? What’s the best? The bitrate indicates the number of bits the audio uses per second. Since CD audio uses 44100 Hz, 16-bit audio it uses 1411200 bits (1411.2 kbps) per second. Calculation: 44100 samples per second x 16 bits per sample x 2 channels (stereo) = 1411200. As you can see, 1411.2 kbps is quite a bit higher than the 96 kbps you mentioned. This is because lossy codecs like MP3 can compress the audio to a fraction of the original size (mostly because it tries to remove as much audio data as possible while still trying to sound as close to the original as possible). Higher bitrates result in higher audio quality (because the file is closer to the original), but also in bigger files. To give you any idea: most modern codecs sound transparent (indistinguishable from the original) around 160kbps. Note that this is just a very rough estimate, please don't take it as an absolute truth!3) I’m planning to use digital optical out from the card (which ever one I chose) do either the sample rate or bit rate affect the digital output? Sample rate and bit rate always affects the overall quality (see previous points), whether you use analog or digital outputs.4) Are external sound cards which use the USB for power good? Or would a separate power supply be cleaner and therefore better? In theory, a separate power supply could be cleaner, but I think the USB power from most systems would be adequate.5) Because i will be using digital out will this by defection pass though the surround sound (I have a 6.1 system)? Are you sure it's 6.1 and not 5.1? Anyway, on most systems the surround sound should pass through just fine, but I don't have any personal experience with it.6) How does the pc interface affect the sound quality (e.g. USB, USB2 or Fire wire)? If you use an external interface like USB or Firewire, you eliminate the risk of getting interference from other components inside your PC case (like you can get with internal sound cards). So this is an advantage of an external interface. Using USB2 or Firewire shouldn't make any difference in sound quality at all.7) Finally has any one used the M-Audio Transit? Is it as good as the Audiophile USB for digital out? If I had to buy a USB sound card right now, it would be the Transit. I haven't used the card myself, but it seems to be a nice card. Phew. That was quite a bit to type (and I've still only scraped the surface of digital audio). I hope it's useful to you.