Skip to main content

Topic: How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s) (Read 2841 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • Phobos
  • [*][*][*][*]
How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s)
I use to archive my music using lastest lame at extreme vbr, but i wanna know how good is aac to archive music as well? 192 is the maximum i would use.

  • rjamorim
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s)
Reply #1
Using AACenc with -extreme profile, you will get bitrates around that and transparency on 99%+ of the musics.

Even with -normal you will get great quality.

Regards;

Roberto.
Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org

  • xmixahlx
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s)
Reply #2
yes, i would second that.

through some [non] intensive testing i still haven't been able to abx the source vs. extreme or archive.

and ivan is the man, btw.


later
mike

  • sven_Bent
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
How good is AAC for archiving? (192 kb/s)
Reply #3
AAC iis better then mp3 at 192. even if you use dibroms tweakings

just be sure to use lates version of the psytell encoder
Sven Bent - Denmark