Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Help an old dude out... (Read 2724 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Help an old dude out...

I'm trying to keep up, but with a pregnant wife I can only read so much!

Anyways two questions.  I'm using EAC and LAME.

1)  How do I tell what version of LAME I'm running?

2)  I want to use the Extreme standard (when I did some blind testing, that's what was transparent to me).  I'm not concerned with encoding time, so I assume Extreme will give better quality than preset fast extreme (due to artifacts with the 'fast' setting).  I currently have "--alt-preset extreme %s %d" as my command line option.  With Lame 3.97b1 can I just leave it as that?

Thanks for the help!

Help an old dude out...

Reply #1 –
Quote
2)  I want to use the Extreme standard (when I did some blind testing, that's what was transparent to me).  I'm not concerned with encoding time, so I assume Extreme will give better quality than preset fast extreme (due to artifacts with the 'fast' setting).  I currently have "--alt-preset extreme %s %d" as my command line option.  With Lame 3.97b1 can I just leave it as that?

With 3.97b, "fast" does not mean "faster at the expense of quality"...... there were even some reports of cases where "fast" did result in better quality.

The difference between fast and non-fast is that non-fast uses the older VBR-algorithm, while fast uses the newer one. Because everything currently points towards fast being at least equal to non-fast in terms of quality, there were some discussions about making "fast" the default, and abandon the older (non-fast) method - but it seems currently that the lame devs dont want to do it *yet* (probably because they want to do a bit more testing to be absolutely sure).

So to make it short: "fast" basically means "new and potentially better", while non-fast means "old but thoroughly tested"
I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.

Help an old dude out...

Reply #2 –
Quote
1)  How do I tell what version of LAME I'm running?
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

During compression, the LAME window should have the version number listed right at the top, although you may have to scroll back up up to see it. Alternately, run lame.exe --help in a command window and it should display the version number along with the help output.

Programs like [a href="http://www.burrrn.net/?page_id=5]Mr. QuestionMan[/url] can tell you what encoder you (or others) used, which can be helpful as well.

Quote
I'm trying to keep up, but with a pregnant wife I can only read so much!

Don't worry--you will have lots of computer time after the baby is born!  <-- irony

Help an old dude out...

Reply #3 –
Thanks for the tips.  That Mr Question Man program is really helpful.  So it seems the jury is out on Extreme Fast ... with indications pointing to parity, but I guess I'll hold off till those with more time decide.

Cheers
 

Help an old dude out...

Reply #4 –
If you settled for "Extreme" then it means that you can hear more artifacts than most of us around here.

Why don't you ABX between VBR old and new?

You would win a lot of time using "new" which you will need once the baby arrives.

I'm the one in the picture, sitting on a giant cabbage in Mexico, circa 1978.
Reseñas de Rock en Español: www.estadogeneral.com