Is it possible to re-assignate a different place for the different plot ? I mean : from left to right, the winner (HE-AAC) to loser (Real?). This may be useful, to see on which sample winner(s) fail(ed). Random position aren't useful in my opinion.
flame verloren:can't open http://audio.ciara.us/test/64test/comments...s/comments.html
Thank you rjamorim for making my results 'anon01'.
from left to right, the winner (HE-AAC) to loser (Real?). This may be useful, to see on which sample winner(s) fail(ed). Random position aren't useful in my opinion.
I was sad to be anon05 - I'll have to demand credit for my hard work next time - though I didn't work half as hard as you guys who did them all!What about processed by rank rather than grade? Is that too much hard work?Cheers,David.
OK, I changed comments.html to index.html.So please use this link now:http://audio.ciara.us/test/64test/comments/Hopefully it'll work :B
I can't understand why didn't the best version of Vorbis used - GT3??? Why did realy hissy and not tuned version compared with quiet old and tuned products when there exists GT3?
the mp3PRO result is interesting.. too bad the format never took off due to the licencing nightmare I see the same fate for AAC coming.. unless there will be a free and superior "LAME aac" encoder, mp3 is gonna stay (yes, except the divx ripping ppl)
LAME MP3Pro HE-AAC Vorbis LC-AAC Real WMA FHG 4.07 3.39 3.13 2.67 2.22 2.05 1.77 1.55LAME is better than MP3Pro, HE-AAC, Vorbis, LC-AAC, Real, WMA, FHGMP3Pro is better than Vorbis, LC-AAC, Real, WMA, FHGHE-AAC is better than LC-AAC, Real, WMA, FHGVorbis is better than WMA, FHGLC-AAC is better than FHG
Results have been slashdotted:http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/2...tid=141&tid=188Get your comments and rebuttals in while the thread's still hot.ff123
"Hydrogenaudio has just wrapped up a listening test of various audio codecs at 64kbps."
That pisses me off. A lot.Sure, it was "Hydrogenaudio" that stayed up till 5:30 AM sorting results, it was "Hydrogenaudio" that took shit on every issue that surfaced, it was "Hydrogenaudio" that screened 500+ results ditching the ones ranking the reference...I'm not an asshole, but I think credit should be given where credit is due. Credits weren't given to ff123's test either, but at least it wasn't misrepresented as being conduced by HA.sigh...OK, rant off.