Originally posted by JohnV I would try something like --dm-preset insane -X3or variants with -X3. Seems that X3 noise calculations handle extreme bass pulse clips like Fatboy pretty well.
Originally posted by ears dibrom,Just for clarity's sake, let me see if I've got this right. You'd say that one will get better quality from:--dm-preset standard -X3than--dm-preset insane -X3Excluding all criteria other than quality? Or are we talking size vs. quality again?
Originally posted by user so I understand that dm standard is quite safe for AQ, and xtreme and insane are still experimental and not really proven to result in better quality than standard.
Do the actual settings get integrated into dm presets of actual alpha versions of lame ?
Originally posted by RD (1) standard has been tested more and performs more consistently than xtreme for some as of yet undetermined reason.(argumentum via experience.)
Originally posted by HomeK Another question: will this decrease quality for LAME 3.90a7? --dm-preset standard -X3 --vbr-mtrh
Originally posted by user --dm-preset standard -X3 -b224 -F --scale 0.98 Added the current best command line, right ?
Originally posted by user Would a minimum bitrate of 224 cause problems, decrease quality (eg. of reduced bitrate reservoir ?) ?Or would the bitrate reservoir be the same, independent if -b224 is used or not, so that -b224 would just be a kind of overkill, but would not cause trouble ?