Skip to main content
Topic: [TOS #8] Delusional or troll, take your pick (Read 83230 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


 

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #27
That just treats the symptoms. He’d be better served through ongoing behavioral therapy and a few courses in critical thinking and science.
Is 24-bit/192kHz good enough for your lo-fi vinyl, or do you need 32/384?

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #28
There. Satisfied?

Yes.  Invert/mixpaste of one onto the other yields total cancellation.

I'm satisfied that you're imagining a difference.

You were asked for listening test logs, though.  These aren't those.



Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #29
@ManInTheDark It's like saying that fonts are less crisp in one word-file than in another identical file. Just makes no sense.

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #30
Have you read what has been said in this thread? The two files are 100% identical. There is absolutely no way they could sound different since there is nothing different about them.

I guess your hearing must suck, your equipment is crap, or a combination of the two (I go for the last one). Mine is golden.

BTW: Greynol has proven that he's nothing but a motherf**king bully masquerading as a so-called moderator.

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #31
I guess your hearing must suck, your equipment is crap, or a combination of the two (I go for the last one). Mine is golden.
You really aren't getting this are you. It doesn't matter the equipment anyone is playing it on, if the source files are identical in every way (checksum, file compare, internal FLAC checksum) then they can't be the source of any sound difference. You'll need to look elsewhere in your playback chain.
Who are you and how did you get in here ?
I'm a locksmith, I'm a locksmith.

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #32
Ah, let him be, he thinks that 81 divided by 9 will give different result depending on who wrote it on the blackboard.
Error 404; signature server not available.

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #33
I guess your hearing must suck, your equipment is crap, or a combination of the two (I go for the last one). Mine is golden.

Maybe its not your hearing, that is the problem
but something in between your ears.
& that really needs to be checked out.

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #34
Wow. The two best audiophile tropes:
       --My ears and gears are way better than yours.
       --You're picking on me

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #35
Nice another audiophile who thinks he hear a difference on Flac and hi res. lol
Got locked out on a password i didn't remember. :/

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #36
Nice another audiophile who thinks he hear a difference on Flac and hi res. lol
 
You mean another audiophool?

There goes another one back to whichever placebophile community/coven he belongs to - wherein his wild goose chase is warmly welcomed - to report on his incursion into the "land of the heathen" that we lot probably are to them. :))
Listen to the music, not the media.
Qualidade em MP3

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #37
I guess your hearing must suck, your equipment is crap, or a combination of the two (I go for the last one). Mine is golden.
BTW: Greynol has proven that he's nothing but a motherf**king bully masquerading as a so-called moderator.
dbl
nonono! if you really "did a listening test to see whether I could tell the difference between the two", please take this: http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=ABX
and give us result.
if not - ManInTheDark is a lier.
moderators to matter! :)

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #38
Dealing with the people in this thread is a waste of time.
He’s since found some time to waste.
Is 24-bit/192kHz good enough for your lo-fi vinyl, or do you need 32/384?

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #39
Nice another audiophile who thinks he hear a difference on Flac and hi res. lol
Errr ... no. He "hears" difference between two bit-identical files.

I don't mean "files which decode to the same signal". I mean two files that only differ in filenames.

Code: [Select]
PS C:\tmp> certUtil -hashfile '.\01. John33_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac' SHA512
SHA512 hash of .\01. John33_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac:
13eb3706873a4201e5b325ea17dcb01746ca26b5776b6795c9591f3335e551e2031fcd12ebf3dc33b68c31cfbae469df8eb75df0516ef9d7b6cc6c4bd638b49b
CertUtil: -hashfile command completed successfully.
PS C:\tmp> certutil -hashfile '.\01. NetRanger_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac' SHA512
SHA512 hash of .\01. NetRanger_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac:
13eb3706873a4201e5b325ea17dcb01746ca26b5776b6795c9591f3335e551e2031fcd12ebf3dc33b68c31cfbae469df8eb75df0516ef9d7b6cc6c4bd638b49b
CertUtil: -hashfile command completed successfully.

If SHA512 isn't good enough (spoiler: it is!), I did a bitcompare ... see attachment.
High Voltage socket-nose-avatar

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #40
By the way, part of me thinks this thread should rather be stickied than binned.

High Voltage socket-nose-avatar

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #41
Nice another audiophile who thinks he hear a difference on Flac and hi res. lol
Errr ... no. He "hears" difference between two bit-identical files.

I don't mean "files which decode to the same signal". I mean two files that only differ in filenames.

Code: [Select]
PS C:\tmp> certUtil -hashfile '.\01. John33_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac' SHA512
SHA512 hash of .\01. John33_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac:
13eb3706873a4201e5b325ea17dcb01746ca26b5776b6795c9591f3335e551e2031fcd12ebf3dc33b68c31cfbae469df8eb75df0516ef9d7b6cc6c4bd638b49b
CertUtil: -hashfile command completed successfully.
PS C:\tmp> certutil -hashfile '.\01. NetRanger_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac' SHA512
SHA512 hash of .\01. NetRanger_Court and Spark (featuring Norah Jones).flac:
13eb3706873a4201e5b325ea17dcb01746ca26b5776b6795c9591f3335e551e2031fcd12ebf3dc33b68c31cfbae469df8eb75df0516ef9d7b6cc6c4bd638b49b
CertUtil: -hashfile command completed successfully.

If SHA512 isn't good enough (spoiler: it is!), I did a bitcompare ... see attachment.

I know flac is the same no matter what, i more poking at that his test wav was high res.
Got locked out on a password i didn't remember. :/

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #42
how come this thread and user still exist
:thinking_face:

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #43
Have you read what has been said in this thread? The two files are 100% identical. There is absolutely no way they could sound different since there is nothing different about them.

I guess your hearing must suck, your equipment is crap, or a combination of the two (I go for the last one). Mine is golden.

BTW: Greynol has proven that he's nothing but a motherf**king bully masquerading as a so-called moderator.

You are whats wrong with the opionated uneducated masses.
For some reasone your think that opnions + ignorance rates higher than facts + knowledge.

You have been proven wrong and at the same time not lifted any shadow of evidence for your claim.

Sven Bent - Denmark

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #44
Be ironic if he came back to call us snowflakes.
Is 24-bit/192kHz good enough for your lo-fi vinyl, or do you need 32/384?

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #45
If you are going to keep this thread alive, at least change the topic to what it is, so people who find it in the future don't waste much time with it.

"Bit Identical files that sound different? (false)"

This thread is more of an entertainment than anything else. Reminds me of a quote from Billy Madison, which I will not put here.


Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #46
Trolls would be entertaining if idiocy wasn’t the new norm.
Is 24-bit/192kHz good enough for your lo-fi vinyl, or do you need 32/384?

Re: FLAC sounds better with John33's version than NetRanger's version?

Reply #47
Don't make me reach back there!

  :))

[TOS #8] Delusional or troll, take your pick

Reply #48
Global FYI: I tested, at random, music files of all types (i.e 44/16, 44/24, 96.24), and always came up with the same result: Raw WAV/AIFF always kicking standard verions of the FLAC encoder. John33's version doesn't have that problem. Why is that? Maybe he uses better tools to compile his stuff than everybody else.

But, to certain arrogant f*cks here, all that matters is getting there in a Mercedes Benz & not in a Toyota Corolla. And whatever they think about something is what it's supposed to be just because they say so. The very definition of pathetic arrogance. In any case, John33 definitely has skills, and better tools, to create his stuff. I'll stick with his FLAC encoder. You babies can use whatever you want to use. Message me when you grow the f*ck up & become adults.

Re: [TOS #8] Delusional or troll, take your pick

Reply #49
But, to certain arrogant f*cks here, all that matters is getting there in a Mercedes Benz & not in a Toyota Corolla. And whatever they think about something is what it's supposed to be just because they say so. The very definition of pathetic arrogance. In any case, John33 definitely has skills, and better tools, to create his stuff. I'll stick with his FLAC encoder. You babies can use whatever you want to use. Message me when you grow the f*ck up & become adults.

Maybe you should change your signature from
"Don't hate me 'cause I have spectacular hearing..."
to "Don't hate me 'cause I talk some spectacular Crap..."

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2019