Various pictures from Arny's posts
Reply #22 – 2015-04-03 08:04:03
OH NOES!! Worst news I've heard all year, but thanks for pointing that out Case. Sorry Arny if I lead you astray on all your keys tests. Now, using my notebook's internal card, I can still show an ability to distinguish [post t=12.5s] but I definitely hear faint what I presume is IM [although it doesn't sound like your 4 kHz target tone sine wave, it is more raspy and buzzy, almost like a triangle or square wave, lower pitch, and perhaps dual tone] So I no longer qualify to even take the tests. *&^%$! Here's me keying off this faint IM distortion, using my 96k setting of my Asus notebook's 3.5mm analog output, but of course keep in mind that may be EXACTLY what the organic twins are doing to too, even though they won't admit it: foo_abx 2.0 report foobar2000 v1.3.3 2015-04-02 23:49:44 File A: keys_jangling_full_band_2496_test_tones_f4.flac SHA1: 5c0d71159fd3702d0515372876e699f1ca8de1d0 File B: keys_jangling_full_band_2496_1644E2Q150_2496_test_tones_f4.flac SHA1: 6bbc99e2f0ca8f3083096b51fa0221792c6b5b85 Output: DS : Primary Sound Driver Crossfading: NO 23:49:44 : Test started. 23:51:20 : 01/01 23:51:24 : 02/02 23:51:28 : 03/03 23:51:31 : 04/04 23:51:35 : 05/05 23:51:38 : 06/06 23:51:42 : 07/07 23:51:45 : 08/08 23:51:45 : Test finished. ---------- Total: 8/8 Probability that you were guessing: 0.4% -- signature -- c191c2e925611bd953a3489c4d4753e1213b0ebb P.S. There are also audible differences in this IM distortion I hear when I change my notebook's advanced speaker settings output page from 96k/24 up to 192/24, should that mean anything.