Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Yet another high rez vs Redbook test... (Read 3886 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Yet another high rez vs Redbook test...

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1531590/avs-aix-...ed-methodology/


I probably shouldn't have read it, as it just annoys the sh*t out of me to see the naivete and wheel-reinvention and obliviousness to everything HA has offered over the years.  If any of you want to help them out please do, I've probably burned my bridge there with my last post.

Yet another high rez vs Redbook test...

Reply #1 –
I thought the idea that the size of a WAV file might vary depending on audio content (rather than sample rate, bit depth, number of channels, and duration) showed a fairly amazing lack of knowledge and understanding.

Which is fair enough - until you decide to influence a test that requires a reasonable level of knowledge and understanding in the same area.

Cheers,
David.
 

Yet another high rez vs Redbook test...

Reply #2 –
Quote from: krabapple on
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1531590/avs-aix-...ed-methodology/


I probably shouldn't have read it, as it just annoys the sh*t out of me to see the naivete and wheel-reinvention and obliviousness to everything HA has offered over the years.  If any of you want to help them out please do, I've probably burned my bridge there with my last post.


IME that forum is not a hotbed of technical sophistication, despite some fairly heroic efforts to help it along in that direction.  Probably best to not take it too seriously.