Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Mess with MAD 0.15.0 (Read 2330 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mess with MAD 0.15.0

Since there are 4 different Madplay 0.15.0b compilations
I decided to make a little test. Performed on WinME\Duron 650
using 10 MP3 tracks (192 kbps).

John33 (Compiled using MSVC) http://rarewares.hydrogenaudio.org/files/MADbundle.zip
------
4:17

Speek (Compiled using MSVC) http://home.wanadoo.nl/~w.speek/download/madplay.exe
-----
8:20

Thop (Compiled using mingw32) http://www.huno.net/cstm/madplay.zip
----
3:22 (2.95.3)
3:04 (2.95.3 Accuracy)
2:40 (2.95.3 Speed)

3:19 (3.2.3)
2:42 (3.2.3 Accuracy)
2:30 (3.2.3 Speed)

William (Compiled using mingw32 3.2.3) See link below
-------
3:23
2:48 (Accuracy)
2:32 (Speed)

Note 1: Thop made his own test using AthlonXP 2224 and 3.2.3 compilations
        have been slower on his machine, so you better make your own test
        to determine which compilation better for your PC.

Note 2: It's strange that accuracy compilations show faster results than
        default. Does anybody have some thoughts about it ?

Question from me: should I use -d (No dither) option when decoding
                  44100 16bit Stereo MP3s and why ? Thanx

Mess with MAD 0.15.0

Reply #1 –
Quote
John33 (Compiled using ICL) .......

It's not ICL, it's also MSVC6.